Lodexa reads the full public record of EU research funding and resolves it into strategic intelligence — for the institutions that allocate it, compete for it, and answer for it.
The evidence of what works is all there — in grant agreements, evaluation reports and publication trails. It is simply buried. Lodexa finds the value in depth.
No dashboards to babysit. No evaluations to commission. The record is read continuously — you ask questions of it.
Every call, grant agreement, deliverable and evaluation report published under EU framework programmes — read in full, continuously, in every official language.
Institutions disambiguated, follow-on funding traced, publication and patent trails joined — one consistent picture across borders, programmes and funding cycles.
Answers arrive as evidence: where impact concentrates, what a portfolio is missing, which decisions the record supports — each claim traceable to its source.
Lodexa is AI-native — it could not be built any other way. But our clients are public institutions, and public institutions cannot act on what they cannot defend. So the product is held to an institutional standard: every claim shows its work.
Institutions that coordinate proposals across borders attract roughly twice the follow-on funding within three years✦ProvenanceDerived from 1,142 grant agreements and 9 programme evaluations, 2014–2024.CORDIS · OpenAIRE · Confidence: high · Verified 09.06.2026 — yet most portfolios are still reviewed one programme at a time✦ProvenanceSurvey of published evaluation mandates across 27 national systems.National agency registers · Confidence: medium — we say so when it matters.
Lodexa automates the reading and the structuring. Judgement and decisions stay with the people accountable for them.
Every analysis is source-attributed down to the document. When confidence is low, we say so — in the product, not the footnotes.
We present data, context and alternative readings. We take no political positions. Drawing conclusions is the user’s task.
Cross-programme impact visibility for the bodies that design Europe’s research agenda — without commissioning a new evaluation each time the question changes.
National participation, success rates and follow-on effects benchmarked against 26 other systems — updated as the record updates.
Trace what previous funding rounds produced — publications, patents, consortia, careers — before deciding the next one. Evaluation lag, removed.
Position proposals where the record shows momentum, find the right consortium partners, and document institutional impact with sources attached.
We are a small team of builders and analysts who believe Europe’s most consequential investment — public research money — deserves better instruments. AI-native and institution-minded: GDPR by default, no surveillance, no data resale, every analysis auditable.
We are pre-launch, working with a first group of pilot institutions through 2026.
We are onboarding a small group of pilot institutions ahead of launch. Join the list and we will be in touch — one considered email a month, at most.
A confirmation email is on its way — click it and you’re in. We read every reply, so tell us about your institution if you like.